Publications

• Kinetics of human soluble and membrane-bound catechol O-methyltransferase: a revised mechanism and description of the thermolabile variant of the enzyme.

  Lotta T., Vidgren J., Tilgmann C., Ulmanen I., Melen K., Julkunen I., Taskinen J.

  Human soluble (S) and membrane-bound (MB) catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT, EC 2.1.1.6) enzymes have been expressed at sufficiently high levels in Escherichia coli and in baculovirus-infected insect cells to allow kinetic characterization of the enzyme forms. The use of tight-binding inhibitors ... >> More

  Human soluble (S) and membrane-bound (MB) catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT, EC 2.1.1.6) enzymes have been expressed at sufficiently high levels in Escherichia coli and in baculovirus-infected insect cells to allow kinetic characterization of the enzyme forms. The use of tight-binding inhibitors such as entacapone enabled the estimation of actual enzyme concentrations and, thereby, comparison of velocity parameters, substrate selectivity, and regioselectivity of the methylation of both enzyme forms. Kinetics of the methylation reaction of dopamine, (-)-noradrenaline, L-dopa, and 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid was studied in detail. Here, the catalytic number (Vmax) of S-COMT was somewhat higher than that of MB-COMT for all four substrates. The Km values varied considerably, depending on both substrate and enzyme form. S-COMT showed about 15 times higher Km values for catecholamines than MB-COMT. The distinctive difference between the enzyme forms was also the higher affinity of MB-COMT for the coenzyme S-adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet). The average dissociation constants Ks were 3.4 and 20.2 microM for MB-COMT and S-COMT, respectively. Comparison between the kinetic results and the atomic structure of S-COMT is presented, and a revised mechanism for the reaction cycle is discussed. Two recently published human COMT cDNA sequences differed in the position of S-COMT amino acid 108, the residue being either Val-108 [Lundström et al. (1991) DNA Cell. Biol. 10, 181-189] or Met-108 [Bertocci et al. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 1416-1420].(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) << Less

  Biochemistry 34:4202-4210(1995) [PubMed] [EuropePMC]

  This publication is cited by 3 other entries.

• Purification and characterization of rat heart and brain catechol methyltransferase.

  Borchardt R., Cheng C.F.

  In an effort to detect the similarities and differences in the properties of rat heart, brain and liver catechol methyltransferase (S-adenosyl-L-methionine:catechol O-methyltransferase, EC 2.1.1.6), we have determined the cellular distribution of this enzyme activity and extensively purified the s ... >> More

  In an effort to detect the similarities and differences in the properties of rat heart, brain and liver catechol methyltransferase (S-adenosyl-L-methionine:catechol O-methyltransferase, EC 2.1.1.6), we have determined the cellular distribution of this enzyme activity and extensively purified the soluble and microsomal enzymes present in these tissues. Purification of soluble heart (688-fold) and brain enzymes (240-fold) were achieved using an affinity chromatographic system. The properties of these enzymes were compared with respect to their molecular weights, substrate specificities, inhibitor specificities and immunological properties. The characteristics of the enzyme active sites were investigated using various methyl acceptor substrates and various analogs of S-adenosylmethionine as methyl donors. A series of analogs of S-adenosylhomocysteine was also evaluated as inhibitors of these enzymes. The immunological properties of the purified soluble and microsomal enzymes from heart and brain were investigated using an antibody isolated from rabbits which had been immunized with the soluble rat liver enzyme. In general the properties of catechol methyltransferases isolated from heart and brain were similar to the properties of the enzyme isolated from liver. Some minor differences in substrate and inhibitor specificities were observed which might suggest slight differences in the active sites of these enzymes. << Less

  Biochim Biophys Acta 522:49-62(1978) [PubMed] [EuropePMC]

  This publication is cited by 1 other entry.